<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Borrow Pit Threat</title>
		<link>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=412</link>
		<comments>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=412#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mundy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The term “borrow pit”- refers to a number of locations throughout the bay that have an increased depth as a result of past dredging projects that removed sand from the bay bottom to fill in adjacent areas. The largest “borrow &#8230; <a href="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=412">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The term <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">“borrow pit</span></strong>”- refers to a number of locations throughout the bay that have an increased depth as a result of past dredging projects that removed sand from the bay bottom to fill in adjacent areas. The largest “borrow pit” is adjacent to JFK airport and was used to fill in the marshlands in that area and create the upland area that is today the airport. The “<em>borrow</em>”,  in “borrow pit”, refers to the sand that was removed as having been borrowed from that location.  In the mid 1980’s the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) was faced with the dilemma of what to do with some of the more contaminated (referred to as type F material) dredge material from the harbor deepening project. While upland disposal and cleaning and reuse methods (heat treatment and use in concrete aggregate production) were options the ACOE saw that the possibility of ocean dumping of this contaminated (with PCP’s and heavy metals) material would produce a huge savings in the cost per cubic yard and ultimately in the overall project price tag.</h3>
<h3> Federal law however prohibited the dumping of this material into the ocean due to the level of its contamination and the harmful effects it would create on the environment.  In response the ACOE developed the plan to dump this contaminated material into the “borrow pits” of Jamaica Bay as it was within the three mile limit and not subject to the same federal oversight. They claimed that once deposited into the “borrow pits” that they would cover it with clean sand and it would not be a hazard. Hearings were held on the issue, at Kingsborough College, and at least a thousand people turned out. The environmental, fishing and recreational groups were outraged and the proposal was quickly dropped.</h3>
<h3>The issue is slowly and quietly being revisited as the ACOE is now tasked with dredging parts of the Van Kull and Passaic River, as well as other Harbor areas that have known contaminants in the sediment. We have been approached by groups that are working with the “dredged material management plan” group, the group that plans future uses for dredge material, who have indicated to us that this plan is once again getting serious attention. The only difference is that this time it will be presented as an environmental benefit to the bay in that the ACOE will be submit that they are attempting to “re-contour” the bay bottom to increase water flow thru the bay and this incidentally be an excuse to use this contaminated fill to fill in the deeper holes (as previously attempted). NYC EDC has even contacted Environmental groups in the area to inquire as to how this would be received in the environmental community.</h3>
<h3>Should the ACOE and NYC EDC seek to pursue this concept it would be met with tremendous outrage and opposition as no one accepts the “fake” science that supports this and see it for what it is- a way to attempt to save money at the expense of, to use Mayor Bloomberg’s words, “<em>what may be the greatest natural treasure lying within the borders of any city in the nation—Jamaica Bay</em>” (from the Oct. 27,2011 press conference).The Ecowatchers  will vigourously oppose any such plan !! </h3>
<h3> </h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=412</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atlantic Menhaden Threat</title>
		<link>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=304</link>
		<comments>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=304#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mundy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jamaica Bay News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are some comments from Bruce Franklin’s Book: The Most Important Fish in the Sea: Menhaden and America The only remaining significant checks on the phytoplankton that cause algal blooms and dead zones are those menhaden schools, and they &#8230; <a href="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=304">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/14_menhadeninseine.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-310" title="14_menhadeninseine" src="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/14_menhadeninseine.jpg" alt="" width="178" height="162" /></a>The following are some comments from Bruce Franklin’s Book:</p>
<p><strong>The Most Important Fish in the Sea: Menhaden and America</strong></p>
<p>The only remaining significant checks on the phytoplankton that cause algal blooms and dead zones are those menhaden schools, and they are now threatened by the ravages of unrestrained industrial fishing. By the end of the twentieth century, the population and range of Atlantic menhaden had virtually collapsed.</p>
<p>The Menhaden is a small forage fish whose significance to our planet is remarkably disproportionate to its tiny size. Known as “the most important fish in the sea,” menhaden filter our waters and provide forage for many of the fish species that flourish along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts.</p>
<p>But the most important fish in the sea is in danger of disappearing.</p>
<p>The systematic slaughter of menhaden is the industrial fisheries’ best-kept secret. Hundreds of millions of pounds of Atlantic menhaden are removed annually from our waters by Omega Protein, a company that grinds them up to sell as fishmeal and pet food. In 2010 alone, Omega Protein harvested 404 million pounds of menhaden.</p>
<p>The population of Atlantic Menhaden has been reduced to a devastatingly low number — stocks have declined 88 percent in the last 25 years.</p>
<p>Scientists are seeing troubling patterns emerge as a result of the loss, including severely malnourished species of saltwater fish that normally feed on them. Striped bass, tuna, cod, bluefish, swordfish, salmon, redfish, mahi mahi, king mackerel, and many other species depend on menhaden for food.</p>
<p>Menhaden themselves are near the bottom of the food chain, feeding on plankton, and filtering harmful particles from our estuaries. They clean our waters at an incredible rate—some scientists have put the figure as high as four gallons a minute per adult fish!</p>
<p>Marine biologist Sara Gottlieb, author of a groundbreaking study on menhaden’s filtering capability, compares their role with the human liver’s: “Just as your body needs its liver to filter out toxins, ecosystems also need those natural filters.” Overfishing menhaden, she says, “is just like removing your liver.”</p>
<p>Each adult fish filters about four gallons of water a minute. Purging suspended particles that cause turbidity, this filter feeding clarifies the water, allowing sunlight to penetrate. This in turn encourages the growth of aquatic plants that release dissolved oxygen while also harboring a host of fish and shellfish. Even more important, the menhaden’s filter feeding prevents or limits devastating algal blooms. Most of the phytoplankton consumed by menhaden consists of algae. Excess nitrogen can make algae grow out of control, and that’s what happens when overwhelming quantities of nitrogen flood into our inshore waters from runoff fed by paved surfaces, roofs, detergent-laden wastewater, over-fertilized golf courses and suburban lawns, and industrial poultry and pig farms.</p>
<p>This leads to a concern on the part of those working to preserve and protect Jamaica Bay as the high nitrogen and subsequent algae blooms are cited for the dissolved oxygen and marsh loss problems the bay is struggling with. The Atlantic States Marine Fishing Commission ASMFC considers a number of issues as it debates its efforts to impose regulations (or not) regarding different species yet to date this has not been a factor in its discussions regarding Menhaden populations. It would seem that as many other areas ,such as the Chesapeake region are facing the same issues (high nitrogen loading and harmful algae blooms) it should be one of the criteria that ASMFC considers as it seeks to set quotas on the take of this highly critical species.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://savemenhaden.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/menhaden_assessment_decline_1979_2009.jpg?w=640&amp;h=481" alt="" width="640" height="481" /> (H. Bruce Franklin is the John Cotton Dana Professor of English and American Studies at Rutgers University-Newark)</p>
<p>_____________________________________________________</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">NOVEMBER 17 2011</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">News Update!!!!!!!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"> Last week the Atlantic States Marine Fishing Commission -ASMFC-responded to  overwhelming public comment the ASMFC finally decided to put the politics aside and agree to set catch limits in order to save this critical species. The comments in favor of such were over 91,000  compared to only 35 advocating that no action be taken. This is great news and will have tremendous positive implications for not only every level of the fish food chain but also for the waters of the many estuaries that have are experiencing algae problems as these fish consume the algae for food. You can read more <a href="http://savemenhaden.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/menhaden-get-a-win/"><span style="color: #0000ff;">hear</span></a> and while this is great news we will have to watch to see that it is implemented and not turned back by the powerful corporate entities who have controlled the discussion on this issue for so long.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=304</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Coverage of Taskforce Meeting on Airport Expansion</title>
		<link>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=280</link>
		<comments>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=280#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mundy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the news coverage of the recent Jamaica Bay Taskforce Meeting that addressed the recent plan to expand JFK airport by filling in and paving over the wetlands of Jamaica Bay. http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2011/04/tempers-flare-over-jamaica-bay-airport-expansion/   http://theforumnewsgroup.com/2011/04/14/jfk-expansion-options-debated/   http://www.queenstribune.com/news/News_041411_BayAreaLocalsFretOverJFK_Plans.html   http://awalkintheparknyc.blogspot.com/2011/04/filling-in-jamaica-bay-for-jfk.html   &#8230; <a href="http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=280">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<address>Some of the news coverage of the recent Jamaica Bay Taskforce Meeting that addressed the recent plan to expand JFK airport by filling in and paving over the wetlands of Jamaica Bay.</address>
<address></address>
<address><a href="http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2011/04/tempers-flare-over-jamaica-bay-airport-expansion/" target="_blank">http://www.sheepsheadbites.com/2011/04/tempers-flare-over-jamaica-bay-airport-expansion/</a><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://theforumnewsgroup.com/2011/04/14/jfk-expansion-options-debated/" target="_blank">http://theforumnewsgroup.com/2011/04/14/jfk-expansion-options-debated/</a><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.queenstribune.com/news/News_041411_BayAreaLocalsFretOverJFK_Plans.html" target="_blank">http://www.queenstribune.com/news/News_041411_BayAreaLocalsFretOverJFK_Plans.html</a></address>
<address> <br />
<a href="http://awalkintheparknyc.blogspot.com/2011/04/filling-in-jamaica-bay-for-jfk.html" target="_blank">http://awalkintheparknyc.blogspot.com/2011/04/filling-in-jamaica-bay-for-jfk.html</a><br />
 </address>
<address><a href="http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/proposed-jfk-expansion-stirs-controversy-with-environmentalists-54627.html" target="_blank">http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/proposed-jfk-expansion-stirs-controversy-with-environmentalists-54627.html</a></address>
<address></address>
<address>At the Jamaica Bay Task Force Meeting, held on april 7th, a packed house listened to a rebuttal of the seriously flawed RPA report that advocated JFK runway expansion into the waters of Jamaica Bay, as well as a number of presentations which highlighted the tremendous volume and diversity of marine and bird life in the area that has been so erroneously characterized as a “dead Zone” in the RPA report. In addition many in the audience were shocked to hear that the same planning group had recommended the same proposal in 1969 which resulted in a year long study by 35 scientists from the National Academy of Sciences. Their efforts produced the comprehensive report entitled : Jamaica Bay ; A Mulit Disciplinary Environmental Study  which ,after looking at the proposal, the need for growth, the jobs created, the noise and environmental impacts and finally the value of this estuary of National Significance, came out with their recommendation. They indicated that there should be no effort made to take any action which would result in filling in of Jamaica Bay due to the importance of this Ecological Jewel. This information was omitted from the RPA report leading many to feel that this omission as well as the overinflated future projections of air passengers , and the failure to address the ability to expand the capabilities of Stewart Airport was due to an agenda that exists on the part of the Port Authority to build a case for the filling in and paving over of Jamaica Bay while ignoring viable alternatives.</address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=280</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to RPA Report on JFK Expansion</title>
		<link>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=263</link>
		<comments>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=263#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/7561465" width="640" height="519" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><br/><br/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamaicabayecowatchers.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=263</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

